Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 15:13

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Where to Watch Le Mans Live Stream 24-Hour Race Online for Free From Anywhere - Business Insider
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Poor appetite? What that can mean and how to get hungry again - The Washington Post
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Feds poised to approve SpaceX’s takeover of another military launch pad - Ars Technica
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Jaire Alexander’s Contract Impeded Packers’ Trade Attempts - NFL Rumors - ProFootballRumors.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Watch: Moment crowd boos and cheers Trump at Kennedy Center - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.